State Ex Rel. Dugan v. Tiktin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.
In Oregon, when an accused in a criminal case seeks pretrial access to a Children’s Services Division (CSD) file made confidential under certain circumstances by statute, 1 the trial court, upon a showing of good cause for disclosure, 2 has a statutory duty to examine the file in camera to determine whether it contains information to which the accused is entitled. ORS 135.873; 3 State ex rel Carlile v. Lewis, 310 Or 541, 543-44, 800 P2d 786 (1990); State v. Warren, 304 Or 428, 434, 746 P2d 711 (1987). The question presented in this mandamus proceeding, involving two criminal cases in which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Carlile v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GravilleOregon Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. WixomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Glode v. BranfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994