Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dugan v. Tiktin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1992No. SC S38514PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.

In Oregon, when an accused in a criminal case seeks pretrial access to a Children’s Services Division (CSD) file made confidential under certain circumstances by statute, 1 the trial court, upon a showing of good cause for disclosure, 2 has a statutory duty to examine the file in camera to determine whether it contains information to which the accused is entitled. ORS 135.873; 3 State ex rel Carlile v. Lewis, 310 Or 541, 543-44, 800 P2d 786 (1990); State v. Warren, 304 Or 428, 434, 746 P2d 711 (1987). The question presented in this mandamus proceeding, involving two criminal cases in which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. Carlile v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. GravilleOregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. WixomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State Ex Rel. Glode v. BranfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API