Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Ladd

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1926No. 26,831PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*660The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

A question of subrogation is involved in this controversy. M. R. Amerman was engaged in constructing and repairing certain streets of the city of Eureka, and was operating under the workmen’s compensation law. Ole Branson was employed by him and was at work on the streets on September 9, 1922, and while at work he was struck by an automobile alleged to have been negligently operated by Claude Ladd, and was so severely injured that he was wholly incapacitated to perform any labor and died about four months later as the result of his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swader v. Kansas Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Insurance Fund v. TaronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Terrell v. Ready Mixed Concrete Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. Dickerson v. Orange State Oil CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Wise v. Morgan-Mack Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API