Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Soto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 27, 1998, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as a bilingual school teacher for a school system until he resigned in anticipation of receiving an unsatisfactory rating on a performance review. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he voluntarily left his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of SahaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of ZwillmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API