Van Damme v. McGilvray Stone Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHEY, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from an order of the superior court of the state of California in and for the city and county of San Francisco denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The action is for the recovery of damages resulting from the killing of three horses of the respondent, alleged to have been caused by the reckless, negligent, and careless operation of a derrick, whereby a high voltage trolley wire was struck and broken by the derrick, and in falling came in contact' with respondent’s horses, instantly killing them.
At the conclusion of the trial, which was had with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Plyer v. Pac. Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Vater v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Bradley v. BradleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- O'Connell v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brown v. ReganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Benson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Zagami, Inc. v. James A. Crone, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- East Broad Top Transit Co. v. FloodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- McCoy v. GustafsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.