Legal Opinion

State v. Questo

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2019No. DA 18-0526PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Jim Rice delivered the Opinion of the Court.

*403***447¶1 Randall Questo appeals the Order entered by the Tenth Judicial District Court, Fergus County, denying his motions to suppress. We affirm.

***448Did the District Court err by denying Questo's Motions to Suppress?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 At approximately 6:00 p.m. on April 24, 2017, the Lewistown Police Department received a call from two employees at the local Boys and Girls Club reporting that an adult male, who "smelled of [an] alcoholic beverage," had just picked up his minor children from the Club and was leaving with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. PrattMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. LovegrenMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. EllisonMontana Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  2. State v. T. WojtowiczMontana Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API