Legal Opinion

Poindexter v. Armstrong

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided December 19, 1994No. Civil 93-2028PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HENDREN, District Judge.

NOW on this 19 day of December, 1994, comes on for consideration defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, and the Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds and Orders as follows:

1. Plaintiff, Jimmie D. Poindexter, brought suit against defendant, Theron Wayne Armstrong (Armstrong) and The Jasher Company (Jasher) claiming, inter alia, that the actions of Armstrong toward and about plaintiff, in connection with a certain bible study group Armstrong led and plaintiff attended, amounted to the tort of outrage and that such actions were properly…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alton R. Kelley and Jan Kelley v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation and Jimmy Marvin Branch, Jr., Alton R. Kelley v. Georgia-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. Alton R. Kelley v. Georgia-PacificCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API