Legal Opinion

Haswell v. Kramer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1995No. 49A02-9503-CV-140PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

Dr. John N. Haswell is before this court on a permissive interlocutory appeal in which he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment as to a medical malpractice claim action brought against him and other health care providers by Donna J. and Brian L. Kramer (collectively referred to as the Kramers).

We affirm.

The relevant facts reveal that the Kramers were residents of Vincennes. Dr. Haswell was Donna's obstetrician/gynecologist who rendered prenatal care and delivered the Kramers first two children. Dr. Haswell continued to give…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jordan v. DeeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Huffman v. Monroe County Community School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dillon v. GloverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Hanover New England Insurance v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. Bova v. RoigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patel v. BarkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Butler Ex Rel. Estate of Butler v. Kokomo Rehabilitation Hospital, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Patel v. BarkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API