Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Kasich

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 1, 2018No. 17-4221PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Two death-row inmates, Raymond Tib-betts and Alva Campbell, moved to enjoin their pending executions, claiming that Ohio’s midazolam-based, three-drug execution protocol presents a constitutionally unacceptable risk of pain and suffering. The district court considered the proffered evidence, determined that the inmates had not met their burden, and denied the requested injunctions. We AFFIRM.

To obtain a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff must meet a four-factor test, Glossip v. Gross, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2726, 2736-37, 192 L.Ed.2d 761 (2015), though…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baze v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Fears v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. Otte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2017

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Rommell Broom v. Tim ShoopCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  4. Carey Dale Grayson v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
  5. David Miller v. Tony ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API