Smith v. Brennan
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
LIAM O’GRADY, District Judge.
This Memorandum Opinion constitutes the Court’s findings of-fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), following a bench trial. For the reasons set forth below, judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants.
I. Background
This suit arises out of an employment relationship between Plaintiff Willard Smith, III and Defendants Donald Brennan, Michael Brennan, and their company, Brennan’s Heating and Air Conditioning Service, Inc., (“Brennan’s MAC”). On June 20, 2014, Smith filed a one count complaint alleging…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Shockley v. City of Newport NewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Benshoff v. City of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Hantz v. Prospect Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chavez-DeRemer v. Plaza Azteca Great Neck, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- Nolet v. APS Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021