People v. Jimenez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that Supreme Court should have granted his motion to suppress. We disagree. The record of the suppression hearing shows that, while walking toward a restaurant to perform a premises investigation check, an officer of the Rochester Police Department observed defendant walking in a lot next to the restaurant. When defendant saw the officer, he fled to the rear of the lot and hid behind a dumpster. When the officer walked into the lot toward defendant, he observed defendant peering out at him from behind the dumpster. Defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re PadillaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. LeungNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. SmartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996