Legal Opinion

People v. Jimenez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that Supreme Court should have granted his motion to suppress. We disagree. The record of the suppression hearing shows that, while walking toward a restaurant to perform a premises investigation check, an officer of the Rochester Police Department observed defendant walking in a lot next to the restaurant. When defendant saw the officer, he fled to the rear of the lot and hid behind a dumpster. When the officer walked into the lot toward defendant, he observed defendant peering out at him from behind the dumpster. Defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In re PadillaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. LeungNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. People v. SmartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API