Legal Opinion

Henderson Overland Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided September 27, 1926No. Docket No. 4776Published

In the case of property acquired in exchange for stock prior to March 3, 1917, if the value thereof is clearly and substantially in excess of the par value of the stock exchanged, such excess may be treated as paid-in surplus in the computation of invested capital. Value of property acquired, determined. The petitioner acquired a lot of the value of $165,000. The lot was acquired as a site for a garage building.

Read the full summary

In the case of property acquired in exchange for stock prior to March 3, 1917, if the value thereof is clearly and substantially in excess of the par value of the stock exchanged, such excess may be treated as paid-in surplus in the computation of invested capital. Value of property acquired, determined. The petitioner acquired a lot of the value of $165,000. The lot was acquired as a site for a garage building. It was subsequently sold pursuant to a decree issued in a condemnation proceeding and a portion of the proceeds of the sale within 60 days after receipt was expended in the purchase…

1Opinion of the Court

APPEAL OF THE HENDERSON OVERLAND COMPANY.

Henderson Overland Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 4776.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

4 B.T.A. 1088; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2076;

September 27, 1926, Decided

In the case of property acquired in exchange for stock prior to March 3, 1917, if the value thereof is clearly and substantially in excess of the par value of the stock exchanged, such excess may be treated as paid-in surplus in the computation of invested capital.

Value of property acquired, determined.

The petitioner acquired a lot of the value of $165,000. The lot was acquired as a site for a garage…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henderson Overland Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API