National Life & Accident Ins. v. Ball
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
In order that there may be an insurable interest in the life of another, “there must be a reasonable ground, founded upon the relations of the parties to each other, either pecuniary or of blood or affinity, to expect some benefit or advantage from the continuance of the life of the assured. • Otherwise the contract is a mere wager, by which the party taking the policy is directly interested in the early death of the assured. Such policies have a tendency to create a desire for the event. They are, therefore, independently of any statute on the subject, condemned, as being against public…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Crismond's Administratrix v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
- Cotton v. Mutual Aid UnionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Western & Southern Life Ins. v. Grimes' Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
3Cited by9 opinions
- First Colony Life Insurance v. SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Kennedy v. Johnson Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
- Davis v. Gulf States Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. DavidsonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.