Legal Opinion
Mobile, Miami & Gulf S. S. Co. v. Lake Giltedge S. S. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 11, 1934No. 7074PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
All matters of account between appellant, the charterer, and appellee, the owner of the Lake Giltedge, were settled and adjusted, except one, an item of $688.2.6, the amount of expense and loss by delay caused the charterer by the overloading of the vessel at Port Tampa. This is an appeal from an adverse decision against the charterer on that one. The charter party provided “charterers are to load, stow and trim the cargo at their expense, under the supervision of the master.” Appellant, relying upon this provision, and upon the general principle that it is the duty…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Olsen v. United States Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Swanzy v. WebsterDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1890
- Bregaro v. The CenturionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1893
- National Dredging & Lighterage Co. v. Turney Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Bethel v. Mellor & Rittenhouse Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nichimen Company, Inc. v. M. v. Farland, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and A/s Vigra, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees v. Seaboard Shipping Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Heinrich C. Horn, of the M/s Heinz Horn v. Cia De Navegacion Fruco, S.A. And J. R. Atkins, D/B/A Alabama Fruit and Produce Companu, Cia De Navegacion Fruco, S.A. And J. R. Atkins, D/B/A Albama Fruit and Produce Company v. Heinrich C. Horn, of the M/s Heinz HornCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Horn v. Cia de Navegacion FrucoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Cia De Navegacion Fruco, S.A. v. M/S Heinz HornDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1964