Legal Opinion

Myer v. Curry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1926No. Appeal, 79PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

The action is trespass to recover treble damages for the wrongful mining by defendants of certain coal alleged to belong to plaintiff and the profits received by defendants therefrom. The verdict was in plaintiff’s favor. The court entered judgment for defendants non obstante veredicto. Plaintiff appeals.

John Penny is the common source of title of both parties to the suit. He became bankrupt and on August 31, 1878, his assignees in bankruptcy conveyed certain coal which had belonged to him to J. B. Sneathen and others. It is under this deed that appellant claims…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fairchild v. Dunbar Furnace Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1889
  2. Trustees of the Proprietors v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Matthews v. RushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Rhoads v. Quemahoning Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. McKelvy v. Wilkinsburg Domestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Myer v. CurrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API