Watkins National Bank v. Sands
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Douglas District Court. Action by the Bank against Sands and another, on a promissory note. From an order, at the May term, 1889, discharging plaintiff’s attachment, it brings error. The-opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
The Watkins National Bank brought an-action against J. G. Sands and O. W. Cherry to recover the sum of $700 upon a promissory note, together with the interest thereon. The plaintiff alleged that Sands had sold, conveyed and disposed of his property, and was about to sell,. *592convey and dispose of the same with the fraudulent intent to cheat, defraud, hinder and delay his creditors; and upon an affidavit setting forth these grounds an attachment was granted. Subsequently, a motion was made by Sands to dissolve the attachment, and it was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shapleigh v. BairdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chapin v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Waggoner-Gates Milling Co. v. Ziegler-Zaiss Commission Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- J. W. Brigham & Co. v. Jones & EverettsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Ottenberg v. CornerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Clingman v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.