Legal Opinion

Kelsey v. Cooley

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from equity term, Livingston county. Action by Otto Kelsey, administrator of George M. Bloodgood, against El. H. Cooley and others, to set aside the discharge of a mortgage, and to declare a trust. The complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorlett, J.

On the 25th day of December, 1873, James Cooley, of York, Livingston county, was the owner of a farm of 136 acres; also some personal property. He was about the age of 70 years, without children or descendants. His heirs and next of kin were Susan E. Cooley and Lucy M. Grey, his sisters, ■who were of full age, living in the town of York. Lucy is still living, but Susan died intestate and unmarried in 1878, leaving no descendants. Amelia Bloodgood was a sister of James Cooley. She died intestate many years ago, leaving Seth C. Bloodgood, her son, and only child. The original plaintiff, George…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. . FunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Children's Aid Society v. . LoveridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Loder v. . WhelpleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. McPherson v. . RollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. In re the New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mace v. ThayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Fellows v. FellowsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1898
  3. Townsend v. RackhamNew York Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API