Legal Opinion

Barson v. Mulligan

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by William G. Barson and others against Agnes K. M. Mulligan and others. On motion for leave to amend the answer.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoef, J.

The defendant Agnes Mulligan, asserting her rights as mortgagee in possession, successfully resisted the plaintiffs’ claim to possession, and obtained a reversal of the latter’s judgment in this action for ejectment. Barson v. Mulligan, 66 App. Div. 486, 73 N. Y. Supp. 262. Upon the second trial it developed that the mortgage under which possession was claimed had been *688assigned by this defendant to one Steers in the year 1888, and, no reassignment being alleged in the answer, or proven, so far as to justify the possession in connection with the original. entry, the rights of this defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barson v. MulliganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Barson v. MulliganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Stedeker v. BernardNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
  4. Foerst v. Empire Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barson v. MulliganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API