Legal Opinion

Kraft-Phenix Cheese Corp. v. Consolidated Beverages, Ltd.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 26, 1939No. Patent Appeal 4223PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the •Commissioner of Patents affirming that of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing the opposition of appellant which sought -to prevent the registration by appellee of the mark “O’Kee-Dokee.” The application .alleges use of the mark sought to be registered since January 2, 1936, for “Nonalcoholic maltless beverages sold as soft ■drinks and syrups and extracts used in ■making the same.”

Appellant, owner of the registered trademark “O-Ke-Doke” issued November 19, 1934, alleges in its notice of opposition that the goods mentioned…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Langfield v. BradyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lekas & Drivas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Bbk Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Central Coast Agriculture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. IsenbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  4. Sholl Dental Laboratory Co. v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  5. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. McDonnellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API