Legal Opinion

Great Eastern Liquor Corp. v. State Liquor Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergax, J.

Whatever may be the reasons of policy leading the Legislature to prescribe the display of price signs and to regulate price advertising of liquor, it seems obvious from a reading of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law as a whole that the Legislature has not attempted to promote temperance by making alcoholic beverages more expensive to New York consumers.

In the same section of the same statute (§ 101-b, subd. 1) which states (as does § 2) that one of the purposes of the act is “ to promote temperance ”, there is a mandatory requirement that manufacturers of brand liquor shall file with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Mobil Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Great E. Liq. v. Liq. Auth.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Brooks v. State Ex Rel. Delaware Alcoholic Beverage Control CommissionSuperior Court of Delaware · 1981
  4. People v. Mobil Oil Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API