Legal Opinion

In re Puritz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 1996Published

1Per curiam

By decision dated April *65512, 1995, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of six months, effective May 12, 1995 (see, Matter of Puritz, 214 AD2d 802). He now applies for reinstatement.

An examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 Ob) (22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]) of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that there is no basis upon which to oppose respondent’s application. Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Cardona,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re PuritzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API