Field v. Pier
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Iron county: Johst K. Pabish, Circuit Judge. Action for partition of the following described premises, to wit: the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter and the south half of the northwest quarter of section 28, and the east half of the northwest quarter, the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter, and lot 1 of section 30, all in town 44 north, of range 4 east, situated in the county of Iron, state of Wisconsin.
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Iron county: Johst K. Pabish, Circuit Judge. Action for partition of the following described premises, to wit: the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter and the south half of the northwest quarter of section 28, and the east half of the northwest quarter, the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter, and lot 1 of section 30, all in town 44 north, of range 4 east, situated in the county of Iron, state of Wisconsin. Plaintiff claims an estate in fee to an undivided one-half interest in said lands, and alleges that defendant has a similar…
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed April 3, 1912:
Vistje, J.
If the tax deed issued by Oneida county April 9, 1905, which included all the lands in litigation, is valid, then it follows that the interest owned by Ida, Helen, and Flora Brinker, as well as by the widow, Mary Brinker, is cut off by the statute of limitations running in favor of the grantee in the tax deed, the lands being vacant and unoccupied. And the interest owned by Louis Brinker is also cut off unless a valid redemption has been made by him.
It is contended by the respondent that the tax deed of April 9, 1905, is void because…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Austin v. HoltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Haseltine v. SimpsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Hoffman v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905