Legal Opinion

Madsen v. Chournos

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1942No. 6545PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent filed a motion in this court to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the action is an unlawful detainer proceeding and that the appeal from the judgment of dismissal was not taken within ten days as required by Section 104-60-14, R. S. U. 1938. An examination of the complaint indicates that the relief sought is possession of the premises together with treble damages for alleged unlawful detainer. A copy of the written contract between the parties is attached to the complaint, but it merely serves to indicate how the tenancy of defendant arose and to set forth the theory of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ute-Cal Land Development v. Intermountain Stock ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Vickery v. KaiserUtah Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API