Legal Opinion
Warren v. Bielecki
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 10, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding to remove respondents from public office pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36. Inasmuch as respondents no longer hold public office, the proceeding is moot (see Matter of Copp v Lankford, 283 AD2d 980 [2001]; Matter of McCoach v Maine, 247 AD2d 784 [1998]; Matter of DeFalco v Doetsch, 208 AD2d 1047, 1048 [1994]). In any event, we note that, based on the findings of fact made by the Referee appointed by this Court, there would be insufficient grounds upon which to remove either respondent from office pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36, which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morin v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- DeFalco v. DoetschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Jones v. FilkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- McCoach v. MaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Copp v. LankfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kalodukas v. BerentsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Kalodukas v. BerentsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Strollo v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
- MatterofKalodukasvBerentsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014