Legal Opinion
Leach v. Kentucky Block Cannel Coal Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 5, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions
At Law. Action by Francis M. A. Leach against the Kentucky Block Cannel Coal Company, Incorporated. On motion by defendant for judgment on the pleadings.
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, District Judge.
The complaint alleges, for a first cause of action, that defendant owns and operates a coal mine in Kentucky; that in April, 1915, plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant for the salé and distribution of defendant’s products for five years in that territory of the United States and Canada which lies east of the seventy-ninth meridian of longitude; and it is then alleged:
“Sixth. The terms and conditions of said contract were that plaintiff was to introduce defendant’s products in the territory in question, and to sell as much thereof as possible, and in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Clark v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- American Cotton Oil Co. v. KirkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1895
- Commercial Wood & Cement Co. v. Northampton Portland Cement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilson v. TowersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Edward Petry & Co. v. Greater Huntington Radio Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1965
- Scott v. Cline Electric Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Wakem & McLaughlin, Inc. v. CulverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928