Legal Opinion

Eckel v. O'Keefe

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 28, 1993No. 1—92—1339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano

Plaintiff Lawrence Eckel filed suit against defendant Mary Beth O’Keefe alleging that he suffered both personal injury and property damage as a result of her negligent operation of a motor vehicle. Approximately two weeks before trial, defendant obtained leave to amend her answer, thereby interposing the affirmative defense that the plaintiff’s own negligence proximately caused his injuries. A jury found for plaintiff, but found him 40% comparatively negligent, resulting in a net recovery to him of $3,200. On appeal, plaintiff alleges two errors. First, he maintains that because the jury did…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foutch v. O'BRYANTIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. E & E Hauling, Inc. v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Wilmere v. StiboltAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Block & Co. v. Storm Printing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCraw v. CegielskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. Yager v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. McCraw v. CegielskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. McCraw v. CegielskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API