Legal Opinion

Terrell v. Ingersoll

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM GREENE. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Greeneville. E. C. Reeves, Sp. Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.

Teri’ell, Ingersoll and Britton were partners in the practice of the law. The firm dissolved, and Terrell removed from the State. Some differences arising as to the division of fees between Terrell and Ingersoll, they agreed to submit the matters in dispute to arbitrators, who awarded that complainant should have one third of the matured or finished business, and one third of all fees settled, that is, paid or closed by note, collateral securify or otherwise, not including unsettled accounts for unfinished business, which were awarded to Ingersoll. On October 24, 1870, the original bill was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Craddock v. CroghanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1801
  2. Greenwald v. RobertsTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ledbetter v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  2. Lagerman v. CasserlySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Brewing Corp. of America v. Pioneer Distributing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Moore v. ChurchwellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944
  5. Moore v. ChurchwellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API