Legal Opinion

Jose Cornejo-Villagrana v. Jefferson Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 2017No. 13-72185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, District Judge:

Petitioner Jose Antonio Cornejo-Villa-grana (“Cornejo”) disputes that he is removable as a resident alien who committed a crime of domestic violence under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 237(a)(2)(E), 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E).

Cornejo was convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence assault against his spouse under Arizona Revised Statutes (“Ariz. Rev. Stat.”) §§ 13-1203 and 13-3601. The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) adopted the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) reasoning that Petitioner was removable, finding that although categorically not a crime…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States v. CastlemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Keith Studhorse, IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Justin WerleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Arturo Aldaco-Quezada v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API