Legal Opinion

Avina v. Cigna Healthplans

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1989No. B035487PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GATES, J.

In the instant appeal, defendants Cigna Healthplans of California, Cigna Hospital of Los Angeles, Dr. Charles Hunter, and Dr. Edward King challenge the orders of the trial court denying their petition to compel arbitration and their motion for reconsideration. The latter order resulted in an imposition of sanctions in the amount of $750 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5.

The determinative facts are not disputed. Antonio Avina enrolled himself and his six dependents, including his wife Esmeralda, the respondent herein, in a group prepaid health plan requiring…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Lemat Corp. v. American Basketball Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. WestlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Davis v. Nissan North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. Loucks v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API