Legal Opinion · Dissent

Andersen v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2006No. Nos. 75934-1; 75956-1Published

1DissentFairhurst, J.

(dissenting) — In these consolidated cases, 19 gay and lesbian couples petitioned to receive the same right that all heterosexual Washington residents enjoy — the right to marry the person of one’s choice. See Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 93-130 (Castle v. Washington, No. 04-02-00614-4, 2004 WL 1985215, Mem. Opinion on Constitutionality RCW 26.02.010 and RCW 26.02.02095 (unpublished order) (Thurston County Super. Ct. Sept. 8, 2004)) [hereinafter CP (Castle)]; CP at 876-901 (Andersen v. King County, No. 04-2-04964-4, 2004 WL 1738447, Mem. Opinion and Order on Cross Mots, for Summ. J. (unpublished…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API