Andersen v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentFairhurst, J.
(dissenting) — In these consolidated cases, 19 gay and lesbian couples petitioned to receive the same right that all heterosexual Washington residents enjoy — the right to marry the person of one’s choice. See Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 93-130 (Castle v. Washington, No. 04-02-00614-4, 2004 WL 1985215, Mem. Opinion on Constitutionality RCW 26.02.010 and RCW 26.02.02095 (unpublished order) (Thurston County Super. Ct. Sept. 8, 2004)) [hereinafter CP (Castle)]; CP at 876-901 (Andersen v. King County, No. 04-2-04964-4, 2004 WL 1738447, Mem. Opinion and Order on Cross Mots, for Summ. J. (unpublished…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.