Legal Opinion

Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Rehurek

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 20, 1975No. 74-391PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOBSON, Acting; Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals a final judgment entered in favor of the appellees in an invasion of privacy suit. We have carefully reviewed the voluminous record on appeal and find that all issues were properly submitted to the jury on conflicting facts and under correct instructions from the court on the law. Sacco v. Eagle Finance Corp. of North Miami Beach, Fla.App.3d 1970, 234 So.2d 406; Santiesteban v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, 5th Cir., 1962, 306 F.2d 9.1

The other points raised on appeal have been considered and found to be without merit.

Affirmed.

BOARDMAN and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jose A. Santiesteban v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. Sacco v. Eagle Finance Corp. of North Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  3. Vinson v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ecological Science Corp. v. Boca Ciega Sanitary Dist.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Metropolitan Dade County v. BrazierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API