Legal Opinion

Morse-Starrett Products Co. v. Steccone. Steccone v. Morse-Starrett Products Co

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1953No. 13271_1PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Circuit Judge.

This case is a continuation of trade-mark and unfair competition litigation between Morse-Starrett Products Co., hereafter Morse-Starrett, and Ettore G. Steccone, hereafter Mr. Steccone, which has extended over a period of three and a half years.

The original suit, commenced by Morse-Starrett, culminated in a judgment being entered on January 11, 1950, wherein the District Court determined that, as between the parties, Morse-Starrett was entitled to the use of the mark “Steccone” as applied to squeegees and the handles thereof. Both parties manufacture a particular type of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Steccone v. Morse-Starrett Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Aladdin Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. DunnahooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Sam Title, AKA Sam Teitelman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. Erwin M. Swam v. United States of America, William Barry, Robert A. Hanselman and Jay G. PhilpottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  5. Warner v. Young America Volunteer Fire DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API