Brietigam v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Petitioners Brietigam and their insuranee carrier, Pacific Employers Insurance Company, seek the annulment of an award of the Industrial Accident Commission in favor of respondent Alfred Robbins. No question is raised concerning Robbins ’ right to compensation, the only point in dispute being the identity of the persons liable therefor. The award was based on the finding that petitioners Brietigam were the sole employers of Robbins at the time of his injury. Petitioners contend that the evidence fails to support the existence of such employer-employee relationship, and that in so resolving…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- S. A. Gerrard Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Riskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Schaller v. Industtrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blew v. HornerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Coleman v. Silverberg Plumbing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Bates v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Sparks v. L. D. Folsom Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Mezerkor v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.