Legal Opinion
Cook v. Holzberger
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 9, 1992No. C-1-90-273PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST thomas McKindles and the ROSCOMMON COUNTY SHERIFF’S department and denying motion FOR SANCTIONS
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
This matter is before this Court for consideration of defendant Thomas McKindles’ response to request for default and motion to dismiss and for sanctions (doc. 25). The Court will construe this motion as a motion to vacate the default judgment entered against Mr. McKindles on September 12, 1991. The plaintiff opposes this motion (doc. 26), and has filed a supplemental brief in opposition to the motion (doc. 33). Defendant McKindles replied…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- American Greetings Corporation v. Gerald A. CohnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Elliott v. Henry County, TNDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999
- Fissette v. DzurendaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Rogers v. City of Hobart, IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020