Legal Opinion
Claremont Flock Corp. v. Alm
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 25, 2002No. 01-1569PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Kjell Aim appeals the district court’s denial of his motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) to vacate a default judgment. We affirm.
I
Appellee Claremont Flock Corporation filed a complaint in federal district court against Aim on September 29, 1998. That complaint, along with a summons, was personally served on Aim in New Orleans, Louisiana in October 1998. On November 16, 1998, Aim, acting pro se, filed an “Answer” in the form of a letter to the court. In that letter, Aim disputed certain allegations contained in the complaint, asserted that he was not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Evelyn Cotto and Edwin Torres, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Bernard v. BausCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
3Cited by24 opinions
- Karak v. Bursaw Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria v. Family Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- George Lowe v. McGraw Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Ungar v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Callon Petroleum Co. v. Frontier InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.