Legal Opinion

Houghtaling v. Stoothoff

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Morschauser, Joseph,

Official Referee. This is an action for a mandatory injunction requiring the defendants to remove a fence erected by them along the north line of a right of way ten feet wide over' which plaintiff was granted an easement for ingress and egress. At the time of the commencement of the action the plaintiff served a notice of motion, in which he applied for a temporary injunction. This motion was denied, and in a memorandum opinion the learned justice held that under the conveyances to the respective parties the defendants Stoothoff and wife were the owners in fee of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Craig v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Bridger v. . PiersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Blackman v. . StrikerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Beardslee v. New Berlin Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Brill v. . BrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martinez v. MundyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Spier v. HorowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Brearton v. Fina, New York County Courts1956
  4. Houghtaling v. StoothoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Tamburo v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API