Legal Opinion

Moody v. Aiken County

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 8, 1923No. 11217Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

The exceptions numbered 1, 2, and 3 will be considered together. The admissibility of testimony is ordinarily addressed to the discretion of the presiding Judge, and his ruling is not the subject of appeal unless there was an erroneous exercise of his discretion, which has not been made to appear in this case. These exceptions are therefore overruled.

*294The next exception that will be considered is No. 4. His Honor, the presiding Judge, thus construed the complaint and answer:

“Mr. Foreman, and Gentlemen of the Jury: The sum and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stone v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  2. Walker v. Chester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  3. Kennedy v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  4. Heape v. Berkeley CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  5. McFail v. Barnwell CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API