Legal Opinion

In Re PT

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 2003No. C5-02-1508Published

1Opinion of the Court

657 N.W.2d 577 (2003)

In the Matter of the Child of P.T. and A.T., Parents.

No. C5-02-1508.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 4, 2003.

Ruth Ann Webster, Gislason & Hunter, LLP, New Ulm, for appellant parents.

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul; and Rachel Cornelius Androli, Jason L. Moran, Special Assistant Nicollet County Attorneys, Le Center, for respondent state.

Michelle M. Zehnder Fischer, Mackenzie & Gustafson, Ltd., St. Peter, for guardian ad litem Sharla Boyer.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge, HUDSON, Judge, and PORITSKY, Judge.[*]

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

Appellants'…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API