Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Wynstone Property Owners' Ass'n

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 18, 2005No. 2-05-0014PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Byrne

From December 17, 2004, to January 4, 2005, plaintiffs filed three motions for a temporary restraining order (TRO). Each motion sought identical relief: an order prohibiting the culling of a herd of deer living in plaintiffs’ gated residential community. The trial court denied the motions, but plaintiffs appealed only from the denial of the third motion. We affirm the denial of the TRO, concluding that plaintiffs have improperly attempted to extend the period for filing an interlocutory appeal under Supreme Court Rule 307(d) (188 Ill. 2d R. 307(d)) by filing successive motions that seek the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hwang v. TylerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Harper v. Missouri Pacific RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Battaglia v. BattagliaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Ben Kozloff, Inc. v. LeahyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Delgado v. Board of Election CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 2025
  3. CNA International, Inc. v. BaerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Fox Fire Tavern, LLC v. PritzkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API