Legal Opinion
Rhodes v. Federal Land Bank
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 16, 1944No. 12626PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.
We have heretofore emphasized,1 in farmer-debtor proceedings under section 75, subsection s,2 of the Bankruptcy Act, that where a conciliation commissioner has held a “hearing”, pursuant to subsection s (3), and has fixed the value of the farmer-debtor’s property, for redemption purposes, “in accordance with the evidence submitted”, the district judge, on petition for review,3 does not have the right to try the question of value de novo on the record,4 merely because he disagrees with the conciliation commissioner on the weight to *614which the conflicting, but substantial,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carter v. KublerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. CarmodyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Dunsdon v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Kauk v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Rait v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Kansas City Journal-Post Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- In Re California Associated Products Co. Wil-Rud Corporation v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. DillmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Rosehedge Corporation v. Millie SterettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Powell v. WumkesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.