O.S.C. & Associates, Inc., D.B.A. Olympic Screen Crafts v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentWiggins, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent from the well-written Majority Opinion. I believe that an apportionment between the allowed amount for deductible compensation and non-deductible disguised dividend pay*1122ments was required in this case. Although the Majority’s affirmance of the Tax Court creates a de facto apportionment, I believe that the regulations entitled the taxpayer to an apportionment by the Tax Court as part of the Tax Court’s redetermination of the taxpayer’s tax liability.
I
It cannot be doubted that the so-called “incentive compensation plan” developed by the taxpayer was nothing more than a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Michael L. Rockwell, and Regina Rockwell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Clapp v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Nor-Cal Adjusters, AKA Nor-Cal Insurance Adjusters, Formerly Hobson Adjusters, a Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Elliotts, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Kent A. Adamson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.