Legal Opinion · Dissent

O.S.C. & Associates, Inc., D.B.A. Olympic Screen Crafts v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 16, 1999No. 97-71199Published

1DissentWiggins, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the well-written Majority Opinion. I believe that an apportionment between the allowed amount for deductible compensation and non-deductible disguised dividend pay*1122ments was required in this case. Although the Majority’s affirmance of the Tax Court creates a de facto apportionment, I believe that the regulations entitled the taxpayer to an apportionment by the Tax Court as part of the Tax Court’s redetermination of the taxpayer’s tax liability.

I

It cannot be doubted that the so-called “incentive compensation plan” developed by the taxpayer was nothing more than a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Michael L. Rockwell, and Regina Rockwell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Clapp v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Nor-Cal Adjusters, AKA Nor-Cal Insurance Adjusters, Formerly Hobson Adjusters, a Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. Elliotts, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Kent A. Adamson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API