Legal Opinion

Knox v. Dean II

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 2012No. E051772PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, cross-defendant, and appellant Donna Jean Knox, individually and as successor conservator and guardian ad litem for Blaine H. Knox,1 appeals from judgment in favor of defendant, cross-complainant, and respondent Lawrence A. Dean II, Blaine’s former conservator, on Donna’s complaint for damages under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil *421Protection Act (the Act) (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 15600 et seq.) and default judgment in favor of Dean on his cross-complaint.2 Donna contends the trial court erred in failing to apply protections under the Act…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. CALIFORNIANS FOR DISAB. RIGHTS v. Mervyn'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Utts v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Hasso v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Utts v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. Williamson v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. T.H. v. Novartis Pharm. Corp., California Court of Appeal, 4th District2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API