Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vision Mortgage Corp. v. Patricia J. Chiapperini, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 8, 1998Published

1Dissent

D’ANNUNZIO, J.A.D.,

(dissenting).

I would affirm the judgment for defendant on the ground that under the entire controversy doctrine plaintiff should have combined the claim based on the Nazario appraisal in its action on the Willis appraisal. I have nothing to add to the majority’s lucid and concise statement of uncontroverted material facts.

The entire controversy doctrine is codified in R. 4:30A. This rule “advances the purpose of R. 4:5-1.” Olds v. Donnelly, 150 N.J. 424, 434, 696 A.2d 633 (1997). R. 4:5-1(b)(2) requires a party’s first pleading to contain “a certification as to whether the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Olds v. DonnellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  4. Tevis v. TevisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Wm. Blanchard Co. v. Beach Concrete Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API