Legal Opinion

Bates v. B. B. Richards Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1893No. 8535PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant, the B. B. Bichards Lumber Company, a corporation, from an order of the District Court of St. Louis County, D. B. Senrle, J., made July 21, 1893, denying its motion for a new trial after verdict for plaintiff for $2,072.83.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The defendant, in December, 1891, entered into .an agreement with the firm of Little, Thompson & Le Page to cut *15certain pine timber owned by the defendant into logs, and deliver the same at a place designated in the contract, at the price of $4 per 1,000 feet. Payments were to be made in specified installments, as the work progressed. On the 10th day of March, 1892, Little, Thompson & Le Page had cut and delivered in the boom designated in the contract 1,237,540 feet of logs, the contract price of which amounted to the sum of $4,950.16.

The plaintiff in this case furnished certain supplies to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cremer v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Romer v. ConterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hahn v. BettingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Quinn v. St. Paul Boiler & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Burton v. GageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Leonard v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API