Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Circuit. Court of Barbour. Tried before the Hon. Jesse M. Carmichael. cited Code, § 4366; Wolfv. State, 41 Ala. 412; Lewis v. State, 35 Ala. 387-8; People v. Bush, 4 Hill, N. Y. 133; State v. Hughes, 76 Mo. 323; Reg. v. Johnson, 1 L. & C. Cr. Cases, 489.

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

The record presents the question as to the sufficiency of the indictment, The indictment charges that Andrew Jackson “did attempt to feloniously take and carry away,” &c. Mr. Wharton seems to hold, that at common law, or in the absence of statutory provision, in an “indictment for an attempt to commit a crime, it is essential to aver that the defendant did some act, to be averred, which, directed by a particular intent, would have apparently resulted, in the ordinary course of things, in a particular crime.” — Wharton’s Crim. Law, § 192. He further holds, that it is in the power of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Miles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Fernandez v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  4. Beasley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  5. Prince v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Burton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Bradford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. State v. De WolfeMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CAL. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. May v. LingoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API