Legal Opinion

Comet Development Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 14, 1991No. 90-490Published

1Opinion of the Court

GERSTEN, Judge.

Appellant, Comet Development Corp., appeals a final summary judgment. We affirm.

A construction mortgage is usually obtained for the purpose of financing construction. In a construction mortgage, the mortgagee retains the proceeds of the mortgage and assumes the duty to pay for materials and supplies for work done. Security and Investment Corporation of The Palm Beaches v. Droege, 529 So.2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

The mortgage in this case was a first mortgage on an existing office building. Appellee did not assume any duty to disburse the funds for any work done. Further, even…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kalbes v. CALIFORNIA FEDERAL S & LDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Security & Investment Corp. of the Palm Beaches v. DroegeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API