Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 12, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

This suit in admiralty was commenced January 31, 1944.

Libelant, an Insurance Company, seeks under the Suits in Admiralty Act of 1920, C. 95, 41 Stat. 525, 46 U.S.C.A. § 741 et seq., indemnity for compensation paid by it to Charles H. Walsh, an employee of its insured, and medical expenses, libelant claiming to have been subrogated to the rights of Walsh.

The respondents first challenged the jurisdiction of this court, which was denied adversely to it in an opinion by Judge Bright dated March 31, 1944, D.C., 56 F. Supp. 452, and then joined issue by the service of its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. Ex Rel. Walsh v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  2. Park v. Hull of the Edwin BaxterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cataldo v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  2. General Motors Overseas Operations Division of General Motors Corp. v. The LichtensteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  3. Wall Street Traders, Inc. v. Sociedad Espanola de Construccion NavalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  4. American Employers Ins. v. Benjamin Foster Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API