Rodriquez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREEN, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted in a jury trial of sale of heroin. The jury assessed punishment at fifteen hundred years’ confinement.
The record reflects that appellant sold to undercover agent Roberts three capsules of heroin for $21.00. The cellophane package from which appellant took these capsules contained 25 to 30 capsules. Chain of custody was shown, and a qualified chemist identified the capsules sold to Roberts as containing heroin.
Appellant offered no testimony at the guilt stage. After the verdict of guilty was returned, the State, at the punishment stage of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Albro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Yeager v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Angle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HoustonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Antonio Rodriguez v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Abell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Christopher Manning v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- Eric Jamal Sheppard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004