Legal Opinion · Dissent

Black v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 2011Published

1Dissent

Mercure, J.P.

(dissenting). I respectfully dissent. The majority adopts a rule that evidence of merchandise dropped frequently on the floor of a department store by customers — a common condition that cannot be prevented in advance — may establish constructive notice of a dangerous condition despite proof that the aisle in which the plaintiff fell was inspected shortly before the incident. In my view, such evidence is insufficient — as a matter of law — to create a question of fact on the issue of whether the recurring nature of the situation may be deemed to *962have put defendant on constructive…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Peralta v. HenriquezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Mercer v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Anderson v. Klein's Foods, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API