Legal Opinion
United Mine Workers International, District 28 v. Harman Mining Corp.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided November 22, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-0026-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN M. WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.
United Mine Workers International, District 28 (“UMW”), brings this cause of action against Harman Mining Corporation, (“Harman”) under the Workers Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, (“WARN”). 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 2101-2109 (West 1991). The matter is presently before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The court has jurisdiction via 29 U.S.C.A. § 2104(a)(5).
FINDINGS OF FACT
The material facts are not in dispute. Harman owns and operates a mining business in Buchanan County, Virginia. UMW is the exclusive bargaining agent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Joy P. Adams Roger D. Wensil v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Energy, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Payne v. Federal Land Bank of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- Washington v. Aircap Industries Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
- Frymire v. Ampex Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1994