Simon v. Broussard
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Edmar Simon, Jr., and his wife, instituted this suit against Darmas Broussard for the annulment of a sheriff’s sale, for an accounting, for damages and for other forms of relief. The trial court rendered judgment sustaining a plea of res judicata filed by the defendant, and dismissing plaintiffs’ suit with prejudice. Plaintiffs have appealed.
The issue presented here is one of law, and that is whether the “thing demanded” in the instant suit is the same as the thing which was demanded in two prior actions filed by one of the plaintiffs. Each of these prior actions…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Woodcock v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Lloveras v. ReichertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Himel v. ConnelySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Ducros v. St. Bernard Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Olsen Engineering Corp. v. Hudson Engineering Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Dart v. EhretLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Johnson v. SweatLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- New Orleans Mortg. Co., Inc. v. City of KennerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Slidell Building Supply, Inc. v. I. D. S. Mortgage Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.